Tag: european criminal law

Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA allows an European supervision Order for home detention in another EU member state.

There is a risk of an abrogating interpretation of the regulations contained in the FD 829/2009 in Italian Courts: why and how solve it.

Reliance on diplomatic assurances has been a longstanding practice in extradition relations between States: but can they really be trusted?

Each Member State has the obligation to provide a scheme on compensation to victims of violent intentional crimes committed in its territory.

How can an extradition request or a EAW surrender to Italy be fighted against? Some ideas and jurisprudence.

The Italian rules governing the retrial of in absentia conviction do not meet European convention on Human rights' standard, because they do not grant the defendant the right to adduce new evidence and disputethe evidence gathered in his absence.

Do Italian courts have to disapply certain provisions of Italian law concerning statutes of limitations due to European rules?

 

Traditionally, the protection of Union's financial interests was within the exclusive competence of European Union Member States and the EU anti fraud office OLAF as well , Eurojust and Europol...

The Italian rules governing the retrial of in absentia convictions do not respect human dignity.

It is thus only “consolidated law” resulting from the case law of the European Court on which the national courts are required to base their interpretation.